March 13th, 2004
Why Oldsmobile did not have to die
In the apparent absence of any willingness from the
mainstream press to do so, we question the official line for the death of a
brand that suffered from, then cured, Cimarronnesia

 |
An
iceberg? A desert? How apt - and these are, believe it or not, recent
official Oldsmobile photos. The voice from within the brand,
perhaps? The conscience of Ron Zarella?
The longest-running American brand should not have ended thus. Soon, just
a few burgundy Collector's Editions will be left; and then, the last
Oldsmobile dealership will quietly cease selling new Oldsmobiles for the
first time in a century.
It is such an ignominious end for a brand once known
for its innovation and performance, so unnecessary, and so unlamented in
the mainstream press.
Production ends this year. We will shed more than a tear, both for what
was and what could have been.
More importantly, however, Lutz and those like him must be
permitted to ensure that this never happens again |
 |
Much
though we like the Infiniti FX, we would have been still more impressed
if... |

 |
... the '99
Oldsmobile Recon Concept that preceded it by three years had been
allowed to proceed.
"The tall wagon," writes xyz in American Concept Cars (xyz,
2002), "featured advanced, but non-distinctive styling, no B-pillars,
two sunroofs, and Smart Trac II all-wheel-drive. A 3-liter DOHC V-6, rated
at 200 horsepower, motivated it. Flat panel displays, front and rear,
provided both information and entertainment. Buttons in the center console
and steering wheel controlled the functions. Space age design seats with
no covering or padded
space were said to be both comfortable and damage proof. The polyurethane
floor covering was also claimed to be very durable."
Even accounting for the mainstreaming that the concept would have
undergone on its route to production, the Recon would have re-established
the brand as a vanguard of innovation |

 |
Further evidence of the
talent at Oldsmobile: the 2000
Profile Concept, described by designer Phil Zak (pictured) as "a
logical step for drivers looking for an innovative, refined, and
sophisticated that can meet their personal and family lifestyle."
The Profile Concept featured seating for five, a Smart Card keyless
entry system à la Mercedes, BMW, and current-day Renault, and
conventionally-opening front doors mated to sliding rear doors |

 |
Oldsmobile's swansong: the 04 Concept of 2001, which - at some auto
shows - was not even displayed with the rest of the Oldsmobiles. The
fateful statement of December 12th, 2000, had been given.
Predating the Solstice by a
year, the 04 Concept may have been front-wheel-drive but was operational,
based on an Opel Astra chassis and built by Bertone.
With a line-up consisting
of just the above three vehicles, Oldsmobile might have been able to
command a premium for both its obvious and its under-the-skin innovation
and sophistication, even
as Buick remained conservative and Cadillac went for post-modernism.
Besides, what better GM brand to welcome up-market Saturn customers (at
least, back when Saturn stood for being different)? |
 |
Half the weight of the
contemporary, C5 Chevrolet Corvette, and yet twice as rigid, the
Aurora-powered Shelby Series 1 could have given Oldsmobile a
Viper-like boost.
Yet it is obvious from Eric Davison's well-written insider account that
true cooperation from Oldsmobile was dependent on a few enthusiasts who
lacked the power to move through a bureaucracy that, in hindsight, seemed
determined on starving the division into suicide |
 |
Dumbing-down the 'halo' car - not only
did Oldsmobile fail to see the value in the innovative Profile and Recon
Concepts, and
ignore the value of a 'halo' Shelby, but then proceeded to tame the
Aurora's styling in 2001.
What had been a futuristic, intriguingly convex/ concave shape with clean,
simple-yet-effective details now became a blandly-reworked Pontiac
Bonneville |

1901 Oldsmobile 'Curved Dash'

1940 Oldsmobile w/ Hydramatic

1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
- but one example of one of the best-selling nameplates ever offered to
the U.S. market |
If you love the
Infiniti FX, as we
do, brace yourself: it had a precedent, as our Senior Analyst Cord Bryson
Raible has been ranting about to all who would listen for some time (Bryson,
I owe you lunch - Ed).
In fact, that forerunner - and, more
importantly, the thinking behind it - could have saved the longest-running
brand in American history, one which once had an unquestioned reputation for
innovation and performance.
Moreover, a new, revealing book by
Eric Davison - Snake Bit (Motorbooks, 2004) - tells the story of how
differently the Oldsmobile-powered
Shelby American Series 1
(which could and should have done for Oldsmobile what the
Viper
did for Dodge) worked out, if the enthusiasts at Olds had been allowed to
prevail.
The rather resigned attitude of the
mainstream automotive media to Oldsmobile's fate greatly puzzles us.
-
Not every domestic automotive
company has had the luxury of being approached by an all-American,
Goodyear-touting, national legend by the name of Carroll Shelby.
-
Not since the original, 1986
Taurus had there been an American sedan with the eye-catching styling of the
1994 Aurora.
-
Not every domestic automotive
company has had Oldsmobile's nameplate and model brand recognition, nor has
briefly allowed its hidden, innovative talent to shine before summarily
dismissing and reassigning it.
Perhaps we should start with the
part that has been as widely reported as GM, anxious to convince a final few
holdout dealers to drop their lawsuits, and holdout customers to switch to
another GM brand, has been able to engender.
The final
Oldsmobile Alero and
Silouhette - one
car representative of the effort some made to rescue the brand, the other a
cynically-rebadged reminder of why it dies this year - will soon roll off the
production line, thus ending, rather ignominiously, America's oldest existing
automotive nameplate.
When Ransom Eli Olds started the
Olds Motor Vehicle Co. in Lansing, Michigan in 1897, he could hardly have seen it coming. Nor
could later owner General Motors, as recently as 1985, when Oldsmobile moved 1,168,982
vehicles (its high point).
Indeed, in 1977, Oldsmobile became the first GM
division after Chevrolet to sell more than one million cars.
Forgive us, then, if we do not toe
the official line that Oldsmobile as a brand had become irretrievable, despite
all attempts to revive it.
Misdirected resources
Hypothetically, if the General had
put half as much effort into Oldsmobile as has been placed in GMDAT (the new
mnemonic for defunct Daewoo), and cloning various results of GMDAT as Chevrolets,
Suzukis, and Canadian Pontiacs (to say nothing of its on-again, off-again
obsession with Fiat Auto and throwing Trailblazer platforms around), we might be telling a very different story.
If Volkswagen's current troubles,
preceded by DaimlerChrysler's woes
(and strongly countered by BMW's success and receipt of investor confidence
after divesting itself of Rover - see
Feature: The BMW-Rover story) have taught us anything, it is that buying
brands to clone them for short-term profit while ignoring one's own treasures
(step up Ford, for
ignoring Lincoln in favor of current darlings Volvo and
Jaguar) is a path wrought with mines.
Had GM been serious about investing
in Oldsmobile for the long-haul, it might have noticed what some of the more
perceptive members of the public saw (despite a gradual decline in promotion):
the talent, certainly, was there.
In 1997, the
Intrigue
beat the Camcord in a Car and Driver test that should have
signaled the beginning of a resurgence. While $6 billion has been spent to save
Cadillac, however, Oldsmobile could only muster a short-lived - if somewhat
fitting - product placement in the X-Files movie that summer.
Additionally, 1999 saw the
introduction of the truly innovative
Recon
Concept, whose sophisticated
styling would still work today amongst a growing sea of car-inspired SUV shapes.
The
2000 Profile Concept
one year later predated the Chrysler
Pacifica, adding sliding
doors but avoiding the 'minivan look.'
Shown a month after the December 12th
official statement of execution, and often not to be found on the Oldsmobile
stand at auto shows, the 04 Concept
of 2001 preceded the Solstice
and borrowed an existing platform from GM's
Opel Astra.
Premature funeral
Not only was GM unwilling to spend
the money required to rescue Oldsmobile, but it seemed intent on giving the
brand a premature funeral.
Even the "soap, toasters, (and)
brooms" (as described by Davison) marketing strategy of Ron Zarella should
have been able to see that the combination of:
-
ditching much-beloved model names
(even after the mind-boggling atrocity of simply placing the
'Cutlass'
label on the last-generation
Chevrolet Malibu
to create
the latest and last Cutlass),
and...
-
... putting the 'Oldsmobile' name
only on the radio faceplates of the new
Alero, Intrigue,
and Aurora
(all far better cars than anyone could possibly have expected), all the while...
-
... refusing to spend the money
required to market the brand,
would effectively doom the
resurgence effort to failure. Did Zarella not realize that the earliest Saturn
buyers, favoring understatement with a touch of different, who were
looking up-market for their next car had nowhere to go under GM's brand
strategy? Or did the contemporary starvation of Saturn, as well as Oldsmobile,
make their decline a convenient, self-fulfilling prophecy?
Unceremoniously pushing out
enthusiasts such as Chevrolet General Manager Jim Perkins (credited with saving
the Corvette)
and Oldsmobile General Manager John Rock (an enthusiast of the
Aurora-powered
Shelby Series 1
project - see below) cemented the doomed strategy.
Put simply, GM buried Oldsmobile
before deciding to kill it.
Resistance to the ultimate 'halo'
project
Then, of course, there was the
Oldsmobile-powered Shelby Series 1,
a vehicle that could have cast a
Dodge Viper-like
glow over Olds. GM may have been want to avoid spending money on marketing
Oldsmobile, but why give only cursory support to a project that garnered media
goodwill and free publicity to the tune of several front page magazine features?
Why not call back the baby boomers
who might have swung toward imports, but for whom the Shelby name was evocative
of their youth?
In Snake Bit (Motorbooks,
2004), Eric Davison tells the story of Shelby's quest, beginning with the trials
and tribulations of dealing with Oldsmobile General Manager John Rock without
being constrained by marketing man Steve Shannon. It would be a common thread;
only the names would change.
John Rock had been responsible for
Oldsmobile's IRL Indy 500 series, which "Simply put," writes Davison,
"he was the John Wayne of the car business, riding into Lansing, Michigan, in
a white Oldsmobile to save the beleaguered car division from the sharp pencils
of the GM accountants."
Rock was so adamant that Oldsmobile
donate its Aurora
V-8 to power the Series 1,
that - faced with a reluctant John Gatt
(Aurora program manager) - he
virtually singlehandedly instituted a program for dealers to sponsor the
Series 1's
development. Sixteen dealers signed-up, at $50,000 apiece.
Unfortunately, Rock retired at the
turn of 1997, even as he continued to assist with the project. That this type of
enthusiasm was bureaucratically bottled borders on criminal.
Rock was succeeded by Darwin Clark,
something of an enthusiast but not as inclined to find ways around bureaucracy
as Rock had been. Davison cites Clark as being offended by Shelby's arrogance,
but surely one could easily argue that far more important issues than personal
sensibilities were at stake! Despite this, Clark apparently may have taken the
option of placing the Oldsmobile badge on the
Series 1
off the table.
Additionally, Davison notes that GM
Powertrain was less than helpful, likely because it feared that the
Series 1
might be competition for the Corvette;
yet the Series 1
was twice as expensive, and decidedly more track-biased and hard-edged.
At the end of the day, there seems
to be little reasoning for why Shelby American did not receive the support it
deserved - or for why Oldsmobile never took advantage of the opportunity. To be
fair, there were problems with the organization of Shelby American, as
outlined in detail by Davison in Snake Bit.
What will Oldsmobile's legacy be,
once the dust, and the negativity, settle? Paradoxically enough considering how
much cynical rebadging was thrown at it, Olds was the first General Motors
vehicle to reverse the disease we call
Cimarronesia (after the notorious Cavalier-based Cadillac of the '80s). The
1994 Aurora, thanks to John Rock, featured a 4.0-liter version
of Cadillac's excellent Northstar engine. Enthusiasts of the revival going on at
Pontiac
(article) - which has
seen the division receive a rear-wheel-drive coupe before Cadillac, and a
Cadillac Northstar-powered Bonneville GXP - would be proud.
Mind you, Oldsmobile never quite
completed the Cimarronesia mission, as the blandly restyled
second-generation Aurora
was left to languish after having promised so much. The Northstar-based Olds
flagship might have been a step in the right direction, but the cries of the
division's engineers that 345hp - not the standard 240hp - were the true
capabilities of its engine went unheeded by GM Powertrain (according to
Davison). Pontiac will be left to carry the vanguard legacy - at least, in the
maverick sense of the term - while Cadillac innovates and Buick tries to avoid
following Olds to its grave.
In earlier days, Oldsmobile was a
pioneer of chrome-plated trim (1926) and of
automatic transmissions (1940), two staples of the domestic
automobile psyche.
"It is credited," notes
Davison, "with the first automotive assembly line, begun in 1901... (and)
Oldsmobile advertising slogans were legendary."
Oldsmobile has brought us such
memorable names as
'4-4-2,' 'Toronado' (recently
voted by Austraila's Wheels magazine as one of the most significant cars
of all time),
'Eighty-Eight,' and
'Cutlass.' Some Oldsmobiles were more
worthy than
others, but enthusiasts and non-enthusiasts alike, when confronted with these
labels, regularly display the kind of
brand recognition that Infiniti, just a start-up in 1991, would have killed for.
Sadly, the type of ingenuity
displayed by
Infiniti's FX
- a key part of the Nissan luxury division's up-and-coming revival - was
left at the concept stage. One wonders why Infiniti, and not Oldsmobile, is
touting a midsize luxury car as "the intelligent muscle car"
(M45).
Why must we read article after
article about how Oldsmobile was beyond saving? "Certainly," notes
Davison, "Rock didn't think so, and neither did (Oldsmobile engineers) Dennis
Weglarz and Vic Ide.
"They were busy helping propel
Oldsmobile to the World Sports Car championship as well as pushing them to the
IMSA sedan championship. Those programs and the Shelby program required belief
in Oldsmobile and its future as well as dedication and enthusiasm from GM."
It is a true pity that there is
precious little evidence of any of the above being forthcoming from anyone not
marginalized into submission - and mounting proof that the brand was squandered
before people like Mr. Robert A. Lutz were in a position to do anything about
it.
"Had Lutz been a force at GM when
the Shelby project was getting underway, there is no doubt in my mind that the
Series 1 project would have been viewed differently within GM," writes
Davison.
We agree - and Mr. Lutz's mission is
simple: GM will not lose another brand. That he has expressed recent support for
even the short-lived Saturn makes our eyes water at what might have been done
for Olds.
In the meantime, only the heartless
will not shed a tear this August, as Oldsmobile needlessly falls by the wayside,
a victim not of lacking
a message but of wanton destruction in the name of short-term profit. It
is a trend many - including us - have cautioned about before, but rarely
have its dire effects been quite so accelerated, tragic, or needless. |